WSJ logo
Forbes logo
Fox News logo
Bloomberg logo
Los Angeles Times logo
The Epoch Times logo
Telemundo logo
NY Post logo
NBC logo
Daily Beast logo
USA Today logo
Miami Herald logo
CNBC logo
Dallas News logo
Quick Practice Area Locator

What Is the Burden of Proof in Federal Criminal Cases?

burden of proof

 

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The burden of proof in a federal criminal trial is founded in the Due Process Clause of Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”  In 1970, the United States Supreme Court expounded upon the Due Process Clause to coin the now famous phrase that a person’s guilt must be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.”  In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 374 (1970).  In particular, the Winship Court held that the government must prove every element of every crime the defendant is charged with beyond a reasonable doubt.  Id. at 364.   Today, the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard constitutes the burden of proof for criminal trials in both state and federal courts.

Put our highly experienced team on your side

Dr. Nick Oberheiden
Dr. Nick Oberheiden

Founder

Attorney-at-Law

John W. Sellers
John W. Sellers

Former Senior Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice

Local Counsel

Joanne Fine DeLena
Joanne Fine DeLena

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney

Local Counsel

Joe Brown
Joe Brown

Former U.S. Attorney & Former District Attorney

Local Trial & Defense Counsel

Amanda Marshall
Amanda Marshall

Former U.S. Attorney

Local Counsel

Aaron L. Wiley
Aaron L. Wiley

Former Federal Prosecutor

Local Counsel

Roger Bach
Roger Bach

Former Special Agent (OIG)

Michael Koslow
Michael Koslow

Former Supervisory Special Agent (FBI)

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Former Special Agent (FBI & IRS-CI)

Kevin M. Sheridan
Kevin M. Sheridan

Former Special Agent (FBI)

Ray Yuen
Ray Yuen

Former Supervisory Special Agent (FBI)

Dennis A. Wichern
Dennis A. Wichern

Former Special Agent-in-Charge (DEA)

Elements of a Crime

Every crime has two or more parts – referred to as “elements” – which must take place for that crime to have occurred.  Most crimes have an element pertaining to the defendant’s state of mind, sometimes referred to as “intent.”  The other elements may regard the type of action taken, the location of the action (i.e. near a school zone), or an object used during the action (i.e. a deadly weapon).  To give an example, the elements of a federal drug trafficking charge are to 1) knowingly or intentionally, 2) manufacture, distribute, or dispense, 3) a controlled substance.  The first element is the intent element, the second element is the type of action, and the third element is the object used in commission of the crime.

In order to meet its burden of proof, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that every element of the crime took place.  To borrow from the drug trafficking example above, the government must prove that the substance involved was a controlled substance, that the defendant manufactured, distributed, or dispensed the substance, and that the defendant intended to manufacture or distribute the substance.  If the government cannot prove that the substance involved was a controlled substance, the defendant must be acquitted. Likewise, if the defendant did not know he was distributing the substance – i.e. it was planted in his suitcase without his knowledge – the defendant must be acquitted.

Sentencing

Federal criminal trials occur in two parts – the fact finding phase, where the defendant’s guilt or innocence is determined, and if guilty the sentencing phase, where the defendant’s sentence or punishment is determined. As noted above, in the fact finding phase, the government is held to the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt burden of proof.  However, in the sentencing phase, factors that affect a defendant’s sentence need only be proven by a preponderance of the evidence.  To meet the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard, the government must prove that more than 50% of the evidence suggests a certain conclusion.

Your Criminal Defense Attorneys

Dr. Nick Oberheiden, founder and principal, has represented clients from across the country in government investigations, grand jury proceedings, and as lead criminal defense attorney. Trained at Harvard Law School, UCLA School of Law, and several other institutions of world reputation, Dr. Oberheiden understands what it takes to prevail in complex criminal matters. His practice is limited to federal law, federal criminal law, and government investigations.

Are you being investigated or charged with a federal criminal offense?  Call Oberheiden, P.C. today for a free and confidential consultation with one of our criminal defense attorneys.

Oberheiden, P.C.
Litigation – Compliance – Defense
888-680-1745
www.federal-lawyer.com
This information has been prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This information may constitute attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Reading of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee similar future outcomes. Oberheiden, P.C. is a Texas PC with headquarters in Dallas. Mr. Oberheiden limits his practice to federal law.

Impeccable Service

ratingratingratingratingrating

Nick Oberheiden is the absolute best federal litigation attorney. Nick gives you the immediate comfort of feeling 100% protected. He is polite, respectful— and extremely compelling. His legal strategy turned out to be brilliant.

– Marshall M.

View more testimonials

Contact Us Today

If you are under
investigation
you should contact us today

Contact the Experienced Attorneys of Oberheiden, P.C. Now for a Confidential Consultation

Contact Us Now