General Services Administration (GSA) Joins White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud
Last Updated:
The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has joined the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, which is chaired by Vice President J.D. Vance. As a member of the Task Force, the GSA will focus specifically on using its data and resources to expose fraud, waste, and abuse within the federal contracting sector.
- The GSA is the federal government’s centralized procurement agency, responsible for overseeing more than $125 billion in federal contracts.
- As a member of the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, the GSA will be focused on exposing fraud during and after the procurement process.
- The GSA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) already has a strong track record of holding contractors accountable through audits and criminal investigations.
- The federal government is encouraging whistleblowers to come forward with information the Task Force can use to pursue civil or criminal charges.
- Government contractors must be prepared to face scrutiny, and those that are under investigation must take defensive action immediately.
The White House Fraud Task Force Will Leverage the GSA’s Resources to Target Government Contract Fraud
The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) announced on May 28, 2026 that it is joining the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud. In doing so, it is, “bringing the full force of its federal procurement, technology, and operational expertise to one of the administration’s most aggressive government accountability initiatives to date.”
The White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud is specifically focused on uncovering and prosecuting fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) under federal programs and within the federal contracting system. As the federal government’s centralized procurement agency, the GSA oversees more than $125 billion in contracts spread across the federal government, and it has unique insight into contractors’ bids, billings, and contract performance. As a result, the GSA’s addition to the Task Force significantly enhances the Task Force’s access and capabilities, and the GSA plans to play a “central role” in exposing government contract fraud going forward.
Vice President J.D. Vance Appointed to Lead White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud
The White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud was established by Executive Order 14395 on March 16, 2026. The executive order appointed Vice President J.D. Vance as the Task Force’s Chairman; and, in a press release issued on May 26, the White House wrote:
“President Donald J. Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance are unleashing an unrelenting, full-scale assault on the fraudsters, scammers, and corrupt operators who have looted billions from American taxpayers. The White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud is moving at unprecedented speed and ferocity to root out the waste, abuse, and criminal exploitation of government programs that have drained billions from hardworking taxpayers.”
As originally established, the Task Force included representatives from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and several other federal agencies and departments. The addition of the GSA expands the Task Force’s reach even further, and the GSA appears to have already hit the ground running.
The GSA Will Play a Key Role in the Task Force’s Efforts to Expose Government Contract Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA)
As part of the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, the GSA intends to assist with, “identifying vulnerabilities, strengthening oversight, and helping lead the government-wide effort to root out fraud, waste, and abuse across contracting programs.” According to GSA Administrator Edward C. Forst, it will do so by offering its “advanced analytical capabilities[ and] investigative support” to the Task Force’s other members.
Notably, the GSA already takes an aggressive approach to exposing fraud, waste, and abuse under the government contracts within its oversight authority. The GSA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) routinely conducts audits, civil inquiries, and criminal investigations targeting government contractors, and it works with the DOJ to pursue both civil and criminal enforcement as warranted.
GSA and DOJ Encourage Government Contract Whistleblowers to Come Forward
Like other OIGs across the federal government, the GSA OIG encourages whistleblowers to come forward. It maintains a fraud reporting hotline, and prospective whistleblowers can submit complaints online as well.
Executive Order 14395 also directs the DOJ to, “take appropriate action to promote the meritorious pursuit by private persons of civil actions,” under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. The DOJ currently has two separate whistleblower programs under which current employees, former employees, and other individuals can come forward and claim sizable monetary awards if their complaints lead to successful civil or criminal enforcement actions.
Even with substantial investigative resources at their disposal, the GSA, DOJ, and other federal authorities still rely heavily on whistleblowers to expose fraud, waste, and abuse under government contracts and programs. Whistleblower complaints can pose substantial risks for the companies they target; and, when facing whistleblower allegations, targeted companies must work quickly to discern the scope of the information that has been provided to the federal government.
Government Contractors Should Take Proactive Measures to Mitigate Their Risk of Facing Scrutiny
With these risks in mind, government contractors need to take proactive measures to protect themselves. Even those that are in full compliance will want to ensure that they have the documentation they need to affirmatively demonstrate compliance if necessary. For government contractors that are not currently facing scrutiny from the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, it will be important to:
- Conduct a Risk Exposure Assessment – Government contractors should work with experienced outside counsel to assess their risk exposure should they face scrutiny from the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud. This includes conducting an assessment of all bids and other submissions made during the procurement process as well as conducting an assessment of government contract compliance.
- Determine What Documentation They Have Available – When conducting these assessments, government contractors should also determine what documentation they have available. This includes both: (i) documentation they can use to demonstrate compliance; and, (ii) documentation that could pose risks in the event of a government investigation.
- Proactively (But Carefully) Address Any Compliance Issues – For any government contractors that are not currently in full compliance (or that have committed procurement fraud or other violations in the past), a proactive approach will be critical. With that said, these contractors will also need to be very careful to ensure that their proactive efforts do not trigger unnecessary scrutiny.
From making misrepresentations during the bidding process to substituting inferior materials and engaging in duplicate billing, federal government contractors can face serious consequences for a wide range of statutory, regulatory, and contractual violations. With the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud aggressively targeting government contractors in 2026 (and most likely beyond), these contractors need to be confident that they will be prepared to withstand the Task Force’s scrutiny if necessary.
Targeted Government Contractors Must Act Quickly to Protect Themselves By All Means Available
If it is already too late to prepare, avoiding unnecessary consequences will involve immediately working to build and execute a defense strategy that is tailored to the risks posed by the Task Force’s investigation. In this scenario, targeted government contractors should immediately engage experienced defense counsel to assist them with:
- Discerning the Scope of the Investigation – When facing a federal investigation, it is critical to quickly discern the scope of the inquiry. Once you know what allegations are at issue, then you can begin the process of building a targeted and strategic defense.
- Identifying the Risks at Hand – Along with discerning the scope of the investigation, it will also be important to quickly identify the risks at hand. What are investigators likely to find? Will the DOJ be able to substantiate criminal charges? These are questions that need to be answered as soon as possible.
- Targeting a Favorable Resolution – Government contractors that are facing federal investigations should work with their defense counsel to target a favorable resolution. What this entails will depend on the specific circumstances involved.
With the White House prioritizing fraud enforcement, we are expecting to see swift investigations and aggressive prosecutions in these cases. We expect many business owners and executives to face the potential for federal imprisonment; and, even when prison time isn’t on the table, owners and executives will need to defend their businesses effectively to avoid substantial fines, loss of federal contract eligibility, and other serious financial consequences. If you need to know more, we strongly encourage you to contact us right away.
Schedule a Free and Confidential Consultation with a Federal Government Contract Fraud Defense Lawyer at Oberheiden P.C.
Oberheiden P.C. is a federal compliance and defense law firm that represents government contractors in all federal law enforcement matters. Our defense team includes several former DOJ attorneys who prosecuted fraud cases for the federal government before entering private practice. To schedule a free and confidential consultation with one of our senior federal government contract fraud defense lawyers as soon as possible, call 888-680-1745 or tell us how we can reach you online now.
Dr. Nick Oberheiden, founder of Oberheiden P.C., focuses his litigation practice on white-collar criminal defense, government investigations, SEC & FCPA enforcement, and commercial litigation.